LOTRO Update 6: Shores of the Great River to contain seven new areas
#1
Posted 29 February 2012 - 22:17
U6 story about new areas
the article lists each area and a little bit about it and at the end has a bunch of screenies of the new areas.
now my question is are they really new areas?
or is it like mirkwood and just one area with 7 lil sections?
the second is how i am reading it based on the descriptions.
but this could be a good thing sorta getting a update as big as mirkwood with all those sections.
Turbine: Powered by their fans
at least until milked dry
to feed the corporate lie
#2
Posted 29 February 2012 - 22:47
Sapience: "No gear is permanent. Characters 'out grow' their gear."
"We will not sell end-game gear. "
"Apparel Dummy is no more. They'll now be called Mannequins"
Orion: "Something needs to go here"
Proud Officer of Strikeforce [Hero] on Dragonbrand
#3
Posted 29 February 2012 - 22:56
LotRO Serverstatus Sidebar Gadget: http://lux-hdro.de/download.php
LotRO Serverstatus RSS: http://lux-hdro.de/s...rstatus-rss.php
LotRO MP Signaturgenerator: http://lux-hdro.de/mp-signatur.php
LotRO Online Signaturgenerator: http://lux-hdro.de/signatur.php
#4
Posted 29 February 2012 - 23:06
Agra, on 29 February 2012 - 22:56, said:
That's odd. I don't recall any mountains bordering the Anduin near the Brown Lands.
Quote
"If someone who always supports a position is a shill , does that mean someone who refutes it constantly is a shill for the opposition?" - Sapience (@rickheaton), a shill
"Pssst, people who think they're being sooper sekret.... I see you! :)" - Sapience (@rickheaton), waxing paranoid
"Hate to ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory, but I never worked on Hellgate. Sorry folks." - Sapience (@rickheaton), former associate of Ping0
"One last thing I'd like to mention is that there seem to be some former members of the community who have decided to add to the concerns and issues surrounding the transition by misrepresenting some facts. Primarily, banning is almost always a last resort. It usually takes a willful act (indeed a series of them) on the part of the party being removed from the community to get banned. Multiple warnings, infractions, and appeals are usually involved. Often times warnings are informal and sent via PM or a simple post asking those involved to change the subject, refrain from posting certain topics, etc." - Sapience, LOTRO Forum Topic Clarification Needed On Profanity Community Guideline
"I may never leave work. Tornados keep popping up between me and home." - Sapience (@rickheaton), with a poor understanding of justice
"... this *is* Sapience we're talking about, he's a big, mean....****Bzzzzzztttt****cli ck****Account Deleted...****" - Arbalister, Sapience's fanboy, in a moment of rare insight.
"It's not what you say, it's how you choose to say it." - Sapience, LOTRO CSM
"It is not what you say that matters, but the manner in which you say it ..." - William Carlos Williams, avowed socialist
Sapientis bardus est.
#5
Posted 29 February 2012 - 23:16
Dalthalion, on 29 February 2012 - 23:06, said:
That's because mountains are used in MMOs to define a boundary. Really there aren't many other options. Would you prefer an invisible wall instead?
Sapience: "No gear is permanent. Characters 'out grow' their gear."
"We will not sell end-game gear. "
"Apparel Dummy is no more. They'll now be called Mannequins"
Orion: "Something needs to go here"
Proud Officer of Strikeforce [Hero] on Dragonbrand
#6
Posted 29 February 2012 - 23:49
"If someone who always supports a position is a shill , does that mean someone who refutes it constantly is a shill for the opposition?" - Sapience (@rickheaton), a shill
"Pssst, people who think they're being sooper sekret.... I see you! :)" - Sapience (@rickheaton), waxing paranoid
"Hate to ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory, but I never worked on Hellgate. Sorry folks." - Sapience (@rickheaton), former associate of Ping0
"One last thing I'd like to mention is that there seem to be some former members of the community who have decided to add to the concerns and issues surrounding the transition by misrepresenting some facts. Primarily, banning is almost always a last resort. It usually takes a willful act (indeed a series of them) on the part of the party being removed from the community to get banned. Multiple warnings, infractions, and appeals are usually involved. Often times warnings are informal and sent via PM or a simple post asking those involved to change the subject, refrain from posting certain topics, etc." - Sapience, LOTRO Forum Topic Clarification Needed On Profanity Community Guideline
"I may never leave work. Tornados keep popping up between me and home." - Sapience (@rickheaton), with a poor understanding of justice
"... this *is* Sapience we're talking about, he's a big, mean....****Bzzzzzztttt****cli ck****Account Deleted...****" - Arbalister, Sapience's fanboy, in a moment of rare insight.
"It's not what you say, it's how you choose to say it." - Sapience, LOTRO CSM
"It is not what you say that matters, but the manner in which you say it ..." - William Carlos Williams, avowed socialist
Sapientis bardus est.
#7
Posted 29 February 2012 - 23:59
thordsvin, on 29 February 2012 - 22:47, said:
LotRO Serverstatus Sidebar Gadget: http://lux-hdro.de/download.php
LotRO Serverstatus RSS: http://lux-hdro.de/s...rstatus-rss.php
LotRO MP Signaturgenerator: http://lux-hdro.de/mp-signatur.php
LotRO Online Signaturgenerator: http://lux-hdro.de/signatur.php
#8
Posted 01 March 2012 - 00:10
#9
Posted 01 March 2012 - 00:11
I've looked at the screenshots - it looks to be a hodgepodge of recycled elements from Eregion, Evendim and Dunland, coupled with a bunch of new elements that couldn't look less Middle-earth-y if they tried.
Oh, and everybody is right - the music is dreadful.
Sorry to be negative again, but I'll stop saying everything Turbine do is awful when they stop doing everything so awfully.
#10
Posted 01 March 2012 - 00:21
#11
Posted 01 March 2012 - 00:39
Creeps
Dorothir - R9 Champion 85Dorostalker - R9 Stalker 85
#12
Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:42
And the zone looks pretty basic and uninspired. You can look at it and see the path of progression through it. Coupled with the fact that it's a narrow corridor of land, I think people might be getting their hopes up if they're looking at it optimistically.
Love how they keep mentioning the number of quests to be included in these new zones, as if that's any indication of quality, or is indeed even relevant.
#13
Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:03
Hajile, on 01 March 2012 - 09:42, said:
And the zone looks pretty basic and uninspired. You can look at it and see the path of progression through it. Coupled with the fact that it's a narrow corridor of land, I think people might be getting their hopes up if they're looking at it optimistically.
Love how they keep mentioning the number of quests to be included in these new zones, as if that's any indication of quality, or is indeed even relevant.
I never did understand why the number of quests was important, especially for an area update that we're already at the level cap for. It's as if they'd think we'd be happier with a zone the size of the barrow downs as long as it had 300 quests compared to an area the size of Forochel with 50.
Creeps
Dorothir - R9 Champion 85Dorostalker - R9 Stalker 85
#14
Posted 01 March 2012 - 14:06
The landscape shots are beautiful, but I look at the map and just shake my head. They shrunk numerous areas, thereby limiting the possibility to revisit said areas into larger zones. Ugh.
#15
Posted 01 March 2012 - 15:20
AgamemnonV1, on 01 March 2012 - 14:06, said:
Just a thought, but is this the way it's going to be all the way to mordor?
Shrinking the areas so they can produce the content very quickly (for them) and say 'look at all the extra content we are giving you'?
As for all the extra money they are investing, just how much more resources does it take to regurgitate bits and pieces from other areas to produce 'new' areas? A helluva lot less than it would to actually design new gfx/sound/etc I bet...
For when the lure of the lootbox proves too much
#16
Posted 01 March 2012 - 17:23
Iorionael, on 01 March 2012 - 15:20, said:
Shrinking the areas so they can produce the content very quickly (for them) and say 'look at all the extra content we are giving you'?
Unless their upcoming Rohan contains the remainder of the Westfold, the Eastfold, the West-Emnet, the East-Emnet, it's going to be a poor showing. I anticipate that a future land expansion of Anorien will be presented at some point, and that is a relatively small mass of land.
To answer Agamemnon's question, yes, something is wrong with MadeOfLions. None of the contemporary Tolkien scholars that I've spoken to have ever heard of him. What he is doing there, from a lore perspective, is beyond me.
"If someone who always supports a position is a shill , does that mean someone who refutes it constantly is a shill for the opposition?" - Sapience (@rickheaton), a shill
"Pssst, people who think they're being sooper sekret.... I see you! :)" - Sapience (@rickheaton), waxing paranoid
"Hate to ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory, but I never worked on Hellgate. Sorry folks." - Sapience (@rickheaton), former associate of Ping0
"One last thing I'd like to mention is that there seem to be some former members of the community who have decided to add to the concerns and issues surrounding the transition by misrepresenting some facts. Primarily, banning is almost always a last resort. It usually takes a willful act (indeed a series of them) on the part of the party being removed from the community to get banned. Multiple warnings, infractions, and appeals are usually involved. Often times warnings are informal and sent via PM or a simple post asking those involved to change the subject, refrain from posting certain topics, etc." - Sapience, LOTRO Forum Topic Clarification Needed On Profanity Community Guideline
"I may never leave work. Tornados keep popping up between me and home." - Sapience (@rickheaton), with a poor understanding of justice
"... this *is* Sapience we're talking about, he's a big, mean....****Bzzzzzztttt****cli ck****Account Deleted...****" - Arbalister, Sapience's fanboy, in a moment of rare insight.
"It's not what you say, it's how you choose to say it." - Sapience, LOTRO CSM
"It is not what you say that matters, but the manner in which you say it ..." - William Carlos Williams, avowed socialist
Sapientis bardus est.
#17
Posted 01 March 2012 - 18:48
As for producing content quickly, no, I doubt it. Turbine's MO has always been to delay things as long as possible. They had a lot of leeway between the time from which Frodo left the Shire to the Fellowship sitting on its butt in Rivendell for some time. They then had this leeway again with Lothlorien. But now it's gotten to the point where the timeline in The Two Towers and The Return of the King will finish in the next month in-game timeline-wise, whereas they have spent the last FIVE YEARS stretching out The Fellowship of the Ring.
No, I think they will do everything they can to prolong the game as long as they can. They confirmed RoR will not take us to Edoras nor the Hornburg. We'll be stuck in central Rohan, probably fighting some small-scale war against Rhunic invaders. They will then take their sweet time alternating between the Battle of the Hornburg and the Last March of the Ents. Then, depending on how much cash there is in LotRO and whether or not WB thinks its viable or not, they might even take us off the path again by having us go East from Rivendell through Mirkwood, through Thranduil's Halls, through Lake-town, and then, finally, the Lonely Mountain (although I have my doubts about this). If they don't do that, then we'll follow the Rohirrim up to Anorien to have a chat with Gan-buri-gan. After which they'll throw us back to Aragorn and the Rangers and have us follow them through Erech and Southern Gondor, probably also doing something akin to making a temporary distraction of sorts (Corsair invader mini-war or something).
Now, what they do after that I have no idea. I don't think they'll let us be on all three fronts (Rohan offensive, Gondor defensive, Southern Gondor offensive), but I'm sure it'll work in instances and skirmishes (or it'll work the same way the Fords of Isen worked). Maybe they'll let us choose which side we'll be on or something. But they're going to do their best to prolong the Battle of the Pelennor Fields for as long as possible. Because after that they'll get real creative with trying to prolong the Field of Cormallen battle. I forsee many Osgiliath skirmishes, probably trying to secure Cair Andros, doing damage with the Rangers at Henneth Annun, scouting the Morannun, and taking pot shots at Minas Morgul.
Suffice to say, they have a lot of content to work with to prolong this game for another five years--if they wanted to.
#18
Posted 01 March 2012 - 18:59
"If someone who always supports a position is a shill , does that mean someone who refutes it constantly is a shill for the opposition?" - Sapience (@rickheaton), a shill
"Pssst, people who think they're being sooper sekret.... I see you! :)" - Sapience (@rickheaton), waxing paranoid
"Hate to ruin a perfectly good conspiracy theory, but I never worked on Hellgate. Sorry folks." - Sapience (@rickheaton), former associate of Ping0
"One last thing I'd like to mention is that there seem to be some former members of the community who have decided to add to the concerns and issues surrounding the transition by misrepresenting some facts. Primarily, banning is almost always a last resort. It usually takes a willful act (indeed a series of them) on the part of the party being removed from the community to get banned. Multiple warnings, infractions, and appeals are usually involved. Often times warnings are informal and sent via PM or a simple post asking those involved to change the subject, refrain from posting certain topics, etc." - Sapience, LOTRO Forum Topic Clarification Needed On Profanity Community Guideline
"I may never leave work. Tornados keep popping up between me and home." - Sapience (@rickheaton), with a poor understanding of justice
"... this *is* Sapience we're talking about, he's a big, mean....****Bzzzzzztttt****cli ck****Account Deleted...****" - Arbalister, Sapience's fanboy, in a moment of rare insight.
"It's not what you say, it's how you choose to say it." - Sapience, LOTRO CSM
"It is not what you say that matters, but the manner in which you say it ..." - William Carlos Williams, avowed socialist
Sapientis bardus est.
#19
Posted 01 March 2012 - 19:03
#20
Posted 01 March 2012 - 19:54
Dalthalion, on 01 March 2012 - 17:23, said:
The West-March borders Turbine's 'Gap of Rohan' map perfectly, so that would be a good place to put a western approach to the country, while their boneheaded 'Great River' map is a perfect fit for The Wold. Two funnelling points leading into a massive, expansive land. Then later, when it comes time to lead the player into Gondor, they can introduce Anorien.
That's six entire zones, each the size of the North Downs at least. Rohan is BIG. Anything less than that will fail to do it justice.
I'm going to get my predicting hat on again here, so we'll see how much I get right later:
Instead of the above, there will be only one zone named "Rohan" with several microzones - all with separate micromaps so the pedantic can claim they are separate areas.
The West-March will be a microzone swamp; because they apparently have to put them in every zone these days, regardless of how inappropriate it is; and The Wold will be their obligatory wight/undead/barrows microzone, because that's another flavour of design they lack the imagination to avoid.
The East and Westfolds will be tiny and house little more than the entrances to the instances of the region; and the East and Westemnets will be the assigned 'mounted combat' areas and will be large, but mostly full of nothing punctuated by camps of Orcs and Dunlendings. They will have slightly different colour schemes to differentiate them. One will be mostly brown and brushy, the other mainly green and grassy. My money is on Westemnet being the green one, what with it bordering Fangorn.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














