Jump to content
LOTROCommunity

The Rage Corner


Recommended Posts

With the recent announcement that adult Hermione will be played by a black woman in the new stage production, the SJWs are quick to jump on the 'anyone who dislikes this is racist' bandwagon. All I can say is Hermione did NOT age well...

 

1450707388254.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 730
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

On the subject of gender bias, I had a funny encounter on the train today. I was heading down Putney way in London and when I got on the train the carriage was empty. I took a seat and settled in

With that one story Doro destroys his reputation

So your contention is you've never met a person with a carry/conceal who wasn't ok with the idea of walking into a church, or mall or any public area and just start shooting people. Also that you've n

Posted Images

To be fair some people did just complain saying Hermione was not black and the casting is just to stop people complaining about lack of diversity.  

J K Rowling tweeted about this saying that nowhere in the books is she described as white.  

But yeah using magic takes a hell of a toll

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cossieuk said:

To be fair some people did just complain saying Hermione was not black and the casting is just to stop people complaining about lack of diversity.  

J K Rowling tweeted about this saying that nowhere in the books is she described as white.  

But yeah using magic takes a hell of a toll

Yeah, I saw her attempt to earn brownie points (pun intended). Thing is, she's mentioned in the books at least twice that Hermione had a pale face. Plus all the book covers, games, films, and even her own little doodles of the character, she was clearly white. When she has described characters with a non-white race before, she's clearly stated it (like Cho Chang, Dean Thomas, Kingsley Shacklebolt, Lee Jordan or the Patil Twins).

It's just another stunt, like the Dumbledore thing. She's well known for appeasing SJWs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
7 hours ago, Ardraug said:

Was gonna post in the antirage corner, but since it's been a while and feminazis/SJW's may be on the lurk, just in case they decide to react.... 

 

http://www.therebel.media/not_guilty_gregory_alan_elliott

 

BOOYAH! 

That gives me some warm fuzzies in the shrivelled place where a heart should be.

But what's this that he has to pay legal fees? I thought if you won a case, the person that dragged you to court was the one that had to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah what's with him having to pay 100k!?!?

I mean while he was deemed innocent, yet he still got punished.

 

I mean think of actual results :

1. You disagree with someone on twitter

2. You get sued

3. Your ability to earn money is restricted, you are threatened by jail and going to court for 3 fucking years and have to pony up 100K to pay your lawyers to get you out of going to jail.

 

This does not seem like a victory at all.  How many people will think 5 times now before disagfeeing with some feminazi on internet because they would not want to go through such 3 year horror story + cost?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, drul said:

Yeah what's with him having to pay 100k!?!?

I mean while he was deemed innocent, yet he still got punished.

 

I mean think of actual results :

1. You disagree with someone on twitter

2. You get sued

3. Your ability to earn money is restricted, you are threatened by jail and going to court for 3 fucking years and have to pony up 100K to pay your lawyers to get you out of going to jail.

 

This does not seem like a victory at all.  How many people will think 5 times now before disagfeeing with some feminazi on internet because they would not want to go through such 3 year horror story + cost?

 

 

Exactly. And I can't find any mention of how much it cost the misandrists to lose the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Doro said:

Exactly. And I can't find any mention of how much it cost the misandrists to lose the case.

Not much at all, if you look at court files and most articles on it, "The Crown" was doing all the accusing and prosecuting...  you know, the Patriachy.  Kinda like when Sarkeesian and Quinn tried to have the UN censor all disagreement.

Guy just finished his ordeal, but come next week I'm sure his lawyers will be looking into the finer details, like the SJW's contact with the police and the libel aspect where they campaigned to have GAE branded as a pedophile.  There's also the part where they frequently unblocked him to reply (a sure indicator of fear for their lives).

http://www.genuinewitty.com/2016/01/21/eight-important-things-to-know-about-gregory-alan-elliotts-twitter-trial/   

My best paralegal bet would be on a civil lawsuit against The Crown for the losses caused by that trial, personal financial and professional, and a criminal lawsuit against the feminazi cunts (drag me to court!) for libel and I'm sure a good lawyer can bring a couple more into play.

Here's the link for his fundraiser in any case:
https://www.generosity.com/fundraising/gregory-alan-elliott-twitter-trial-support-fund

This little rapist patriarch will be contributing later this afternoon once his female boss is threatened and virtually raped in the worst kind of ways (translation: once I call her, without her previous consent, to remind her to pay me this week's work... because btw, you apparently need a woman's consent to TALK to her or it's rape according to the feminazis... despite the logical flaw of how to get consent without speaking in the first place).

Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Ardraug said:

Reminds me of the whole 'gamergate' thing, where the vocal feminazis were creating new accounts to send themselves horrible messages and death threats, just to make it seem like they had a point. If I were that guy, I'd be taking all of the news reporters that attributed that tweet to him for all they're worth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://louderwithcrowder.com/the-milo-yiannopoulos-scholarship-for-white-people/

Can't wait for the fallout on this ^_^

Article does make a point though.  

Until I've owned a black slave, I owe black people nothing.  

"A woman gave carried you for 9 months!!!111oneoneeleven", true, and the women using that kind of "argument" aren't half the woman my mom is so I owe them nothing.

"For centuries, white people have.. " FUCK OFF, I WAS BORN IN 1980.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
8 hours ago, cossieuk said:

What the hell Apple

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35502030

Just glad I dont have any Apple crap

If this is specifically limited to the fingerprint reader, I can sort of support it.

You can't allow the phone to be unlocked by a malicious party who replaces the correctly working fingerprint sensor with one that will authorize the attacker.

Now, myself I would implement this as invalidating the sensor and get on with life with the already enforced fallback to a PIN/password. Apparently Apple sees this as an attack that should be reacted to by destroying the data altogether as soon as you get a chance so that further physical tampering doesn't retrieve it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, cossieuk said:

All this does is allow Apple to charge what they want for repairs and people know that going elsewhere risks you loosing your data.  Yet another example of the Apple closed ecosystem 

That depends on whether this is limited to the fingerprint sensor or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Darmokk said:

That depends on whether this is limited to the fingerprint sensor or not.

I don't think that matters at all.  Fingerprint reader is yours as well as is rest of the phone is - you should be allowed to tamper with it yourself or repair it at any place if you want to.

+

"When an iPhone is serviced by an unauthorised repair provider, faulty screens or other invalid components that affect the touch ID sensor could cause the check to fail if the pairing cannot be validated."

"I did get the front screen replaced, and I understand that it's now considered "tampered with", but at least let me use my iPhone on the old IOS system... I can't retrieve old photos or important documents I once had."

 

This convinced me to never even consider getting Apple. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35531436

Guy cleared after false sexual assault allegation was made against him.

The story that the liar who accused him gave was that she was walking through Waterloo station in London and she was penetrated by the perpetrators left hand, which lasted for between 2 and 3 seconds, and then aggressively shoved in the shoulder. She then apparently screamed for help, and everyone stopped, while he ran away.

The truth turns out that she was in Waterloo station in London, walked passed a man who was holding his backpack strap with his right hand and a newspaper in the other, and was clear of him within half a second. There was no pause, the video surveillance shows they didn't even acknowledge each other (well, she apparently did after he passed her and was already roughly 2 meters away from him), and she was apparently wearing a coat, jacket, and dress over yoga pants. Even a master of sleight of hand would be impressed if he had done. She also didn't shout anything.

So it should be all good then, right? Not really, and for a few reasons.

1. It should never have even gone to trial. There was no evidence, no witnesses, and the CCTV didn't back up her claim at all. It apparently only got that far because prosecutors slowed the footage down to make it seem possible. She also couldn't even pick him out in a line-up.

2. It took a year of his life to prove he was innocent of something that didn't happen. Seriously, a fucking year. They had CCTV showing he was innocent but it took a year for someone to stamp that as official. All because some cunt decided to lie about someone assaulting her. And that can happen to anyone.

3. His name is out in the open. Hers? Not so much. I've done some digging and I've found one name in particular that crops up and who fits the bill, but that obviously can't be confirmed. If it is the nobody 'actress' that's going to be playing a High Priestess in Game of Thrones, then I find it laughable.

4. Nothing will happen to her for lying, wasting police time, and attempting to ruin an innocent stranger's life. They've actually gone out of their way to protect her identity. A person that could potentially ruin the lives of people she's around, since she has no problem making up such stories, and people aren't allowed to be aware of it? Like she's the victim in all of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Doro said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35531436

Guy cleared after false sexual assault allegation was made against him.

The story that the liar who accused him gave was that she was walking through Waterloo station in London and she was penetrated by the perpetrators left hand, which lasted for between 2 and 3 seconds, and then aggressively shoved in the shoulder. She then apparently screamed for help, and everyone stopped, while he ran away.

The truth turns out that she was in Waterloo station in London, walked passed a man who was holding his backpack strap with his right hand and a newspaper in the other, and was clear of him within half a second. There was no pause, the video surveillance shows they didn't even acknowledge each other (well, she apparently did after he passed her and was already roughly 2 meters away from him), and she was apparently wearing a coat, jacket, and dress over yoga pants. Even a master of sleight of hand would be impressed if he had done. She also didn't shout anything.

So it should be all good then, right? Not really, and for a few reasons.

1. It should never have even gone to trial. There was no evidence, no witnesses, and the CCTV didn't back up her claim at all. It apparently only got that far because prosecutors slowed the footage down to make it seem possible. She also couldn't even pick him out in a line-up.

2. It took a year of his life to prove he was innocent of something that didn't happen. Seriously, a fucking year. They had CCTV showing he was innocent but it took a year for someone to stamp that as official. All because some cunt decided to lie about someone assaulting her. And that can happen to anyone.

3. His name is out in the open. Hers? Not so much. I've done some digging and I've found one name in particular that crops up and who fits the bill, but that obviously can't be confirmed. If it is the nobody 'actress' that's going to be playing a High Priestess in Game of Thrones, then I find it laughable.

4. Nothing will happen to her for lying, wasting police time, and attempting to ruin an innocent stranger's life. They've actually gone out of their way to protect her identity. A person that could potentially ruin the lives of people she's around, since she has no problem making up such stories, and people aren't allowed to be aware of it? Like she's the victim in all of this.

I saw that just yesterday, Doro, and it really pissed me off as well. The CCTV had them passing each other in one second. Impossible for him to do what she claimed imo. I don't understand why this woman who falsely accuses him is allowed to stay anonymous. Hasn't she commited a crime by lying? That poor guy should sue her for pain and suffering. Can't someone figure out who this 'film star' is so she can at least be named and shamed? Where's TMZ when you need them?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/9/2016 at 6:36 PM, Tinker said:

Can't someone figure out who this 'film star' is so she can at least be named and shamed? Where's TMZ when you need them?

The internet, it's faaantastic 

And for bonus poops n' giggles, here's the latest feminazi show of womanly strength *snickers*

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Ardraug said:

The internet, it's faaantastic 

And for bonus poops n' giggles, here's the latest feminazi show of womanly strength *snickers*

 

Current "high profile" celebrity trial here in Canada.

Quote

Linked article: "As one veteran Toronto lawyer put it this week, “the criminal justice system has been hijacked by ideology,” in this instance, the feminist chant that accusers must always be believed."

http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-the-ghomeshi-sex-assault-case-started-falling-apart-right-from-the-start

The guy is a scumbag who has admitted he gets wood by beating on women. He is a celebrity and this trial is all about women who were willing to get horizontal and were, no doubt, shocked when he started to slap them around.

Problem is rather than go straight to the cops they were willing to endure this disgusting behavior as a potential career connection or simply to feed on his celebrity. When the story broke women were willing to pile on but neglected to mention to the cops/lawyers they still sought a relationship after being slapped around.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fittybolger said:

Current "high profile" celebrity trial here in Canada.

http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-the-ghomeshi-sex-assault-case-started-falling-apart-right-from-the-start

The guy is a scumbag who has admitted he gets wood by beating on women. He is a celebrity and this trial is all about women who were willing to get horizontal and were, no doubt, shocked when he started to slap them around.

Problem is rather than go straight to the cops they were willing to endure this disgusting behavior as a potential career connection or simply to feed on his celebrity. When the story broke women were willing to pile on but neglected to mention to the cops/lawyers they still sought a relationship after being slapped around.

Oh, like that Asian girl that sent her boyfriend a load of messages wanting to do anal, did it, apparently didn't like it, continued the relationship (sending dirty messages as well), then when they split she got pissy and said he raped her. Luckily, the case was dropped due to all of the evidence suggesting otherwise, so she carried a mattress around university so that he would get expelled. He didn't, but the constant campaign she put up against the guy was insane... going so far as to make her own 'porn' video of a recreation of the event with another guy. I mean how fucking mental do you have to be to recreate something like that anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/11/2016 at 4:02 PM, Doro said:

I mean how fucking mental do you have to be to recreate something like that anyway?

http://www.breitbart.com/education/2016/02/10/fake-blood-and-war-chants-milo-yiannopoulos-event-at-rutgers-disrupted-by-feminists-black-lives-matter-activists/

This answer your question? =P 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...